I am starting to see this game's age. For example, the view is too small, and there is a glitch where I might end up passing through a slope if I tried to jump onto it.
Nonetheless it's still an addictive time waster, and these things are pretty much nitpicks that don't devalue the player's experience in a noticeable way.
Like Delvonshi said, the framerate skips are too much for a game that requires this much skill.
Also, I have to accustom myself to the fact that every time I hit a wall I tend to stick to it.
It's not bad. Just not that great either.
It wasn't really hard to finish. I know that a lot of the game is supposed to be about noticing little details but there wasn't any really difficult logic puzzles to be found.
I finished the game but I was hoping for some challenge.
This is a very fun game. I laughed immediately when I saw Trump interrupt Clinton.
I just wish that you put a little more effort into the Clinton email part. For example, I would have liked some emails that cause you to lose voters when deleted instead of having to delete every single one. It would force players to slow down instead of rushing as fast as they can in finishing the job.
I did better with Clinton for some reason. 887K vs. 878K votes, even though I screwed up the email part.
Finally I would have loved to play as one of the third party candidates. I find that it was a mistake to leave them out of the equation.
It's fun, so I give this game 5 stars.
It did provide a good amount of challenge, that's for sure.
This is a really good take on this game! Well done!
I also like the fact that you start out with a wall to defend yourself against the first few birds, and you deflect birds off of your crushers, so that you won't be punished as hard for eliminating birds that would have gone through without your intervention.
I also like the diversity and the customization that is available to the player for this game. It really adds depth, variety, and progression to the game, which is great.
For the amount of fun and the promising nature this game has to offer, I give this game 5 well-earned stars.
Kind of sucks that I am currently trying to make an idea for a new NG site layout.
7 slots -> 8
Anyways, I really like what you did with that game of yours, playing around with the site itself instead of just putting something in the content area like a normal person.
For that, these 5 stars are well-deserved.
I think that this is the turd of the week. Anyways, a first person platformer is a neat idea, but the fact that the player doesn't have any shadow to guide them, the ridiculous colors, simple level design, and the fact that restarting is a hard reset deters me from rating this higher.
The graphics of the game is made he waits for and the challenge of the game and that not to fall otherwise you restart afresh
It's like playing a game where you have to censor a bunch of technologies before they come out into public eyes. Unfortunately I find that the fact that there's a limit kind of detracts from the point of the game, and the same could be said about the fact that you can only see one sheet of paper at a time.
Still a remarkable format to start a game off at, but there is room for improvement. I recommend taking a look at Papers, Please and read into the history of censorship as a whole.
Don't forget that not all censorship is bad. We don't want KKK or ISIS bastards to be able to run amok, right?
This is a very unique game that I would hate to see die, but unfortunately I am deterred by the fact that the game's simplicity and lack of progression, which doesn't amount to a lot of play time in my experience.
Yep, just a prototype and design-experiment, was not meant to be a full fledged game. At least not yet ;)
Age 27, Male
10256A 132 St. Surrey BC
Joined on 9/4/11
Snow Drift 
Big Tower Tiny Square 
Toon Escape - Tomb 
House of Tards 
Mercurial Story 
Flapping Crush: Halloween Bird 
TrumpGrounds 
Don't touch the planet! 
Spell Sorter 
CRAVEN